EEF Expansion: Elements of the EEF—Tensions

Tensions are inherent strains to be named, navigated, and normalized. They can provide support in traversing the Orthodoxies named in the Equitable Evaluation Framework™.

Tensions are inherent in change processes, but they need not become breaking points.
Tensions can cause emotional, cognitive, or relational strain, requiring deft attention and
navigation. As individuals expand their being, thinking, and doing, opposition between existing practices and processes and emerging possibilities can create resistance, frustration, and confusion.
Rather than getting stuck in either/or, embracing a both/and approach recognizes complexity.Tensions provide a way to notice and surface the interrelationship of varying levels and issues in the practice of the EEF at differing perspectives. Tensions provide opportunities to name and address the dissonance (opposing ideas/approaches driven by different values and fears) and shift toward consonance (flow between one another). The aim and intention is not to “solve” tensions; rather it is to recognize, name, normalize, and navigate them.
Social Positions & Roles Deference to hierarchy and social status | | ![]() | | Influence, Organize, Mobilize One's sphere of influence to step in or bring others along |
A Thing A project, program, study, etc. done in isolation or a vacuum | | ![]() | | A Body of Work An expansive view that offers through lines and ah-ha’s connecting intentions and concepts |
Individuals Individual competencies, needs, desires, and values | ![]() | Organizations Organizational capacities, culture, and mission | ![]() | Systems Structural conditions and underlying systemic drivers at play |
Technical Approaches A focus or priority on detailed tactical tools and approaches | | ![]() | | Conditions for Change The support and nurture of relationship, trust, and related factors that invite possibility |
Use & Adaptation Application and modification of information and insights from people and sources for one’s own credit | | ![]() | | Acknowledge & Attribution Recognition of the work that supports or informs your work with citation |
Urgent & Reactive Pressures of deadlines, dockets, deliverables and decisions that revert to default practices | ![]() | | Aligned & Responsive Time to pause and think about how the work might strategically integrate and advance aims and intentions |






The part about naming tensions instead of solving them really made me think about my own team. I looked up War of Genesis: Idle Loot Wiki while reading and it helped me see the both/and idea in a new way.
The both/and idea stuck with me, especially how tensions can show the flow between different values instead of becoming breaking points. I used colony flow to think through how a project and a body of work connect over time.
Instructors looking into teaching tools and growth will find numerous practical tips shared by experienced colleagues.
This framing of tensions as something to be named rather than smoothed over really resonates. In practice teams often default to papering over these strains instead of sitting with them, which is where a lot of the real learning gets lost. Turning our own evaluation debates into a low quality image maker meme has been a surprisingly effective way to surface the unspoken tension without making it personal. Thanks for laying this out so clearly.
Gracias por compartir este contenido. Las personas interesadas en Magis TV pueden encontrar útil este tipo de información para conocer mejor el tema. Antes de utilizar una aplicación, recomiendo revisar quién la distribuye, qué permisos solicita y qué medidas de privacidad ofrece al usuario.