top of page

EEF Expansion: Elements of the EEF—Principles

  • Writer: Equitable Evaluation Initiative
    Equitable Evaluation Initiative
  • May 21, 2023
  • 1 min read

Principles are the foundational guideposts of the Equitable Evaluation Framework™.

A graphic representation of the EEF Principles are shown as three guideposts in the foreground with bright red circles at the top, skinny posts to the ground, and roots connecting each of them underground.

The EEF includes a commitment to three Principles. These foundational guideposts support reconceptualization of evaluative work, evaluative thinking,7 and decision-making. As such, the EEF Principles offer examination of the why and how and what of evaluation.


Principle One

Evaluation and evaluative work should be in service of equity:

  • Production, consumption, and management of evaluation and evaluative work should hold at its core a responsibility to advance progress towards equity.

Principle Two

Evaluative work should be designed and implemented commensurate with the values underlying equity work:

  • Multi-culturally valid, and

  • Oriented toward participant ownership.


Principle Three

Evaluative work can and should answer critical questions about the:

  • Ways in which historical and structural decisions have contributed to the condition to be addressed,

  • Effect of a strategy on different populations, on the underlying systemic drivers of inequity, and

  • Ways in which cultural context is tangled up in both the structural conditions and the change initiative itself.

The EEF Principles have application to all actors in the philanthropic ecosystem and are relevant no matter foundation typology, organizational assets, size, or structure. Over time, as these Principles are internalized into habits, they become (or align with) values and foster the creation of a wide variety of practices for varying contexts.



* Vo, Anne T., Jacob S. Schreiber, and Ashley Martin. (2018). “Toward a conceptual understanding of evaluative thinking.” New Directions for Evaluation: 29-47.

Wehipeihana, Nan, and Kate McKegg. (2018). “Values and culture in evaluative thinking: Insights from Aotearoa New Zealand.” New Directions for Evaluation: 93-107.

 
 
 

28 Comments


Janelle Moore
Janelle Moore
May 27

Hôm nọ mình có lướt qua một vài trang mạng và thấy nhiều người bàn tán về https://lucky-win.us.com/ đặc biệt là về các thông tin thể thao trực tuyến. Thế là mình cũng tò mò ghé vào xem thử cách mà họ sắp xếp nội dung. Mình không đi sâu vào từng chi tiết mà chỉ dành chút thời gian để xem cách phân chia các mục và giao diện. Thực sự cảm thấy nếu các thông tin được trình bày rõ ràng, dễ hiểu thì việc đọc lướt cũng không gặp khó khăn gì.

Like

Hook Stickman
Hook Stickman
May 25

The controls are simple enough for beginners, but later stages become surprisingly technical once moving platforms and narrow paths appear. stickman hook

Like

Mai Khoa
Mai Khoa
May 12

Thói quen của tôi là đọc nhanh các bài giới thiệu khi dùng điện thoại, nên tôi đánh giá cao những nội dung được trình bày gọn gàng. Bài viết này làm khá tốt điều đó khi phần https://789f.mba/ không bị đặt quá lộ liễu. Thay vào đó, nội dung được triển khai mượt mà, tập trung vào trải nghiệm và các danh mục giải trí quen thuộc, giúp người đọc dễ hình dung tổng thể.

Like

yaqian zhang
yaqian zhang
May 11

I wasn’t expecting Mad Drive to be this addictive. The controls are simple enough for beginners, but later stages become surprisingly technical once moving platforms and narrow paths appear.


Like

jena allen
jena allen
May 04

The topic of the expansion of the EEF and its constituent elements demonstrates a systematic approach to principle construction and application. Clearly defining each element and principle makes the analysis or implementation process more consistent, limiting ambiguity in interpretation. This systematic approach is similar to that in fnaf, where every element in the operating mechanism has its own rules and players must thoroughly understand each signal.

Like
bottom of page